Differences in mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunogenicity among patients undergoing dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Differences in immunogenicity between mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have not been well characterized in patients undergoing dialysis. We compared the serologic response in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at 2 academic centres in Toronto, Canada, from Feb. 2, 2021, to July 20, 2021, which included 129 and 95 patients who received the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, respectively. We measured SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) at 6-7 and 12 weeks after the second dose of vaccine and compared those levels with the median convalescent serum antibody levels from 211 controls who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: At 6-7 weeks after 2-dose vaccination, we found that 51 of 70 patients (73%) who received BNT162b2 and 83 of 87 (95%) who received mRNA-1273 attained convalescent levels of anti-spike antibody (p < 0.001). In those who received BNT162b2, 35 of 70 (50%) reached the convalescent level for anti-RBD compared with 69 of 87 (79%) who received mRNA-1273 (p < 0.001). At 12 weeks after the second dose, anti-spike and anti-RBD levels were significantly lower in patients who received BNT162b2 than in those who received mRNA-1273. For anti-spike, 70 of 122 patients (57.4%) who received BNT162b2 maintained the convalescent level versus 68 of 71 (96%) of those who received mRNA-1273 (p < 0.001). For anti-RBD, 47 of 122 patients (38.5%) who received BNT162b2 maintained the anti-RBD convalescent level versus 45 of 71 (63%) of those who received mRNA-1273 (p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing hemodialysis, mRNA-1273 elicited a stronger humoral response than BNT162b2. Given the rapid decline in immunogenicity at 12 weeks in patients who received BNT162b2, a third dose is recommended in patients undergoing dialysis as a primary series, similar to recommendations for other vulnerable populations.

Anxiety and psychosocial impact during coronavirus disease 2019 in home dialysis patients.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) resulting in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is documented to have a negative psychosocial impact on patients. Home dialysis patients may be at risk of additional isolating factors affecting their mental health. The aim of this study is to describe levels of anxiety and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among home dialysis patients. This is a single-centre survey of home dialysis patients in Toronto, Ontario. Surveys were sent to 98 home haemodialysis and 43 peritoneal dialysis patients. Validated instruments (Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Item [GAD7] Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale, Family APGAR Questionnaire and The Self Perceived Burden Scale) assessing well-being were used. Forty of the 141 patients surveyed, participated in September 2020. The mean age was 53.1 ± 12.1 years, with 60% male, and 85% home haemodialysis, 80% of patients rated their satisfaction with dialysis at 8/10 or greater, 82% of respondents reported either "not at all" or "for several days" indicating frequency of anxiety and depressive symptoms, 79% said their illness minimally or moderately impacted their life, 76% of respondents were almost always satisfied with interactions with family members, 91% were never or sometimes worried about caregiver burden. Among our respondents, there was no indication of a negative psychosocial impact from the pandemic, despite the increased social isolation. Our data further supports the use of home dialysis as the optimal form of dialysis.

Quotidian nocturnal hemodialysis improves cytokine profile and enhances erythropoietin responsiveness.

Inflammation is implicated in the pathogenesis of erythropoietin (EPO) resistance in patients with end-stage renal disease. Interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are suggested to suppress erythropoiesis in uremia. Insulin like growth factor (IGF)-1 has been proposed to stimulate erythropoiesis. Nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) has been demonstrated to improve anemia management with enhanced EPO responsiveness without altering survival of red blood cells. We tested the hypothesis that augmentation of uremia clearance by NHD results in a reduction of proinflammatory cytokine levels, thereby enhancing EPO responsiveness. Using a cross-sectional study design, 14 prevalent patients on NHD and 14 patients on conventional hemodialysis (CHD) matched for age and comorbidities and controlled for hemoglobin concentrations and iron status were studied. Outcome variables included EPO requirement and plasma levels of EPO, parathyroid hormone, C reactive protein, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IGF-1. The primary outcome was to determine the between group differences in (1) cytokine profile and (2) EPO requirement. The secondary outcome was to examine the potential correlation between cytokine levels and EPO requirement. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, comorbidities, hemoglobin, iron indices, and parathyroid hormone levels between the two cohorts. EPO requirement was significantly lower in the NHD cohort [90.5 +/- 22.1 U/kg/ week (NHD) vs. 167.2 +/- 25.4 U/kg/week (CHD), p = 0.04]. Plasma IL-6 levels were lower in the NHD cohort [3.9 +/- 0.7 pg/ml (NHD) vs. 6.5 +/- 0.8 pg/ml (CHD), p = 0.04]. C reactive protein tended to decrease [4.59 +/- 1.34 (NHD) vs. 8.43 +/- 1.83 mg/L (CHD), p = 0.14]. TNF-alpha, and IGF-1 levels did not differ between the two groups. Direct associations were found between EPO requirement and C reactive protein levels (R = 0.62, p = 0.001), and IL-6 levels (R = 0.57, p = 0.002). Augmentation of uremic clearance by NHD improves EPO responsiveness in end-stage renal disease. A possible mechanism for this improvement is through better control of inflammation, as manifested by lowering of plasma IL-6 levels. Further studies are required to clarify the mechanisms by which NHD decreases inflammation.